Final verdict
Google Sites and Elementor cater to different user needs, with Elementor offering a more robust set of features for web design and ecommerce.
Google Sites (Overall Grade: 5.6/10)
is best suited for users looking for a simple, collaborative platform to create basic websites. It integrates well with Google Workspace services, making it a convenient choice for users already embedded in the Google ecosystem. Its ease of use and collaborative features are notable, but it falls short in terms of design flexibility, ecommerce capabilities, and advanced features.
Elementor (Overall Grade: 7.4/10)
stands out for users seeking extensive customization options, ecommerce functionalities, and a wide range of integrations. It offers a powerful drag-and-drop editor, a vast library of templates, and advanced design capabilities, making it suitable for both beginners and professional web designers. Elementor’s flexibility and scalability make it a superior choice for creating complex, feature-rich websites.
| | |
---|---|---|
4.9 | 9.2 | |
Ease of use | 8.3 | 8.8 |
Ecommerce | 1.8 | 7.6 |
Website Editors | 7.0 | 8.5 |
Product testing options | 6.9 | 5.6 |
Price | 8.1 | 8.0 |
Hosting quality | 8.2 | 7.8 |
Website speed optimization | 3.3 | 6.7 |
Plugins and integrations | 6.4 | 7.6 |
Marketing features | 2.6 | 7.8 |
Customer support | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Security | 9.3 | 9.1 |
AI capabilities | 0 | 7.4 |
User Management | 7.8 | 8.8 |
Overall | 5.6 | 7.4 |
Best for ecommerce
1.8
7.6
Verdict
: For users looking to build an ecommerce site, Elementor is the clear winner over Google Sites, offering a comprehensive suite of ecommerce features.
Google Sites
: Lacks native ecommerce functionality, relying instead on third-party integrations for any ecommerce capabilities. It’s more suited for simple websites that don’t require complex ecommerce features.
Elementor
: Provides a robust platform for ecommerce through its seamless integration with WooCommerce, offering customizable product pages, a variety of ecommerce-specific widgets, and responsive design templates, making it ideal for creating sophisticated online stores.
Best for informational & business websites
7.2
8.9
Verdict
: Elementor is the superior choice for informational and business websites, offering greater design flexibility and customization options.
Google Sites
: Offers a straightforward, user-friendly platform ideal for creating simple informational websites. Its seamless integration with Google Workspace makes it a convenient option for users already embedded in the Google ecosystem.
Elementor
: Stands out for its extensive customization capabilities and wide range of templates, making it ideal for businesses looking to create more sophisticated and visually appealing websites. Elementor’s flexibility and design options cater to a broader range of professional needs.
Detailed comparison
Design functionalities & templates
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
4.9
9.2
🏆
Winner: Elementor.
If you’re looking for a platform that offers more creative control, a wide array of design features, and a larger selection of templates, Elementor is the preferred choice.
Google Sites offers a limited number of templates suitable for various purposes, from personal blogs to business websites. These templates are designed for user engagement, simplicity, and functionality, allowing for customization to meet specific needs. However, compared to other website builders like Elementor, Google Sites might offer less variety in templates and design customization options.
On the other hand, Elementor offers an extensive range of templates and designs, with over 100 responsive website kits covering various categories like business, creative, education, and more, directly available through Elementor’s platform. Additional sources like Envato Elements, Template Monster, and others provide a wider selection, including free and premium options, catering to diverse web design needs.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
Generate Your Website
No credit card required
Ease of use
Ease of useReflects the platform’s overall user-friendliness.Score
Components:
- Learning curve (40%): Quickness and ease of getting started.
- Interface design (30%): Simplicity and intuitiveness of layout.
- User guidance (20%): Quality of tutorials and support.
- Flexibility (10%): Adaptability to various user skills.
8.3
8.8
🏆 Winner: Elementor
. With a score of 8.8, Elementor edges out Google Sites (8.3) in terms of ease of use. Elementor’s user-friendly interface, drag-and-drop functionality, and wide range of pre-designed templates make it a flexible and intuitive platform for building websites. Google Sites also offers a user-friendly interface and integrates seamlessly with other Google services, but it may lack the advanced features that Elementor provides.
Learning Resources
🏆 Winner: Elementor
. Both platforms offer a wide array of learning resources, but Elementor goes a step further with its Elementor Academy, which covers topics from basic usage to advanced design and business growth strategies. Google Sites also offers practical guides and comprehensive digital skill development programs, but Elementor’s resources are more extensive and cater to a wider range of user needs.
For ecommerce
EcommerceMeasures the platform’s effectiveness in supporting online business activities.Score Components:
- Ecommerce themes and templates (20%): Variety and design of templates.
- Product management (25%): Ease of managing and organizing products.
- Payment options (25%): Variety and convenience of payment methods.
- Ecommerce features (20%): Features for managing an ecommerce store.
- Integration (10%): Compatibility with external e-commerce tools and services.
1.8
7.6
When it comes to ecommerce, Elementor clearly outshines Google Sites. Elementor’s seamless integration with WooCommerce provides a robust platform for online stores, offering customizable product pages, a variety of ecommerce-specific widgets, and responsive design templates. Google Sites, on the other hand, lacks built-in ecommerce features and relies on third-party integrations for such functionalities.
Ecommerce themes and templates | 0.0 | 7.8 |
Product page customization | 0.0 | 8.4 |
Payment processing and commissions | 1.0 | 7.5 |
POS capabilities | 0.0 | 5.5 |
Payment gateways | 2.0 | 7.0 |
Product numbers | 0.0 | 7.0 |
Additional ecommerce features | 0.5 | 8.0 |
Google Sites ecommerce features:
Google Sites does not have built-in ecommerce features. However, you can integrate ecommerce functionalities into a Google Sites website by embedding third-party tools or widgets, linking to an external ecommerce platform, or using buttons that link to payment processors.
Elementor ecommerce features:
- WooCommerce Integration
- Customizable Product Pages
- Ecommerce Widgets
- Product Categories and Filters
- Shopping Cart Customization
Ecommerce themes & templates
Google Sites does not offer any ecommerce templates. On the other hand, Elementor offers a diverse range of ecommerce-specific templates suitable for various online stores. These templates are designed to be mobile-responsive and SEO-friendly, ensuring optimal performance across devices and search engines.
Product page customization
Google Sites lacks any product page customization features. All product listings are done through embedding third-party platforms, and all customization can be done within these platforms. In contrast, Elementor offers extensive customization options for WooCommerce product pages, including custom layouts, WooCommerce widgets for various product elements, and options for styling product galleries and ‘Add to Cart’ buttons.
Payment processing
You can integrate payment gateways into Google Sites using external tools or links, not through native features. This can be done by embedding HTML code for payment buttons from services like PayPal, Square, or Stripe, or by linking to an external checkout page. On the other hand, Elementor supports several payment gateways, notably through plugins and integrations, with Stripe and PayPal being prominent options for simple and widespread use. These gateways charge their own transaction fees, typically around 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction, but Elementor itself does not impose additional fees for transactions.
Website Editors
Website EditorsEvaluates the platforms’ website building and editing capabilities.Score Components:
- Customization tools (40%): Range and power of editing features.
- Editor usability (30%): User experience within the editor.
- Design flexibility (20%): Freedom in layout and design changes.
- Update and maintenance ease (10%): Simplicity of updating and maintaining the site.
7.0
8.5
🏆
Winner: Elementor
. Elementor, with a score of 8.5, offers a drag-and-drop interface that makes it easy to customize layouts, add content, and style websites visually in real-time. With a wide array of widgets and templates, users can effortlessly design complex elements such as sliders, forms, and animated headlines. Additionally, Elementor provides responsive design options, ensuring websites look great on all devices, alongside advanced features like custom CSS, role-based access control, and integration with a variety of marketing tools.
Google Sites’ editor, scoring 7.0, offers a user-friendly website builder editor that allows users to create and design websites without needing coding knowledge. With its drag-and-drop interface, users can easily add, customize, and arrange elements such as text, images, and videos on their web pages. It also provides a variety of templates and design options to help users get started quickly and ensure their site looks professional. Additionally, Google Sites integrates seamlessly with other Google services, enabling the incorporation of Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Maps directly into the website.
Mobile editor/app
0
0
🏆
Winner: None
. Both Google Sites and Elementor do not offer a mobile editor/app. Therefore, users cannot edit their websites on the go using a mobile device. This could be a limitation for users who prefer to make quick edits or updates to their websites from their mobile devices.
Product testing options
Product Testing OptionsAssesses the options for trying out platform features before commitment.Score Components:
- Trial quality (40%): Extent and usefulness of the trial or free version.
- Feature accessibility (30%): How many features are available to test.
- Trial duration (20%): Length of the trial period.
- Ease of transition (10%): Smoothness of moving from trial to paid plans.
6.9
5.6
Overall Result
:
Google Sites wins
. Google Sites scores 6.9, while Elementor scores 5.6 in product testing options. Google Sites offers a free version and a 14-day free trial, allowing users to test some premium features. On the other hand, Elementor also offers a free version but only for self-hosted WordPress.org, and it doesn’t provide a trial version. However, Elementor allows users to test all premium features during the refundable period and offers a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Free Plan | Yes | Yes, but only for self-hosted WordPress.org |
Trial Duration | 14 days | No |
Testing Premium Features | Some features during free trial | All features during refundable period |
Money Back Guarantee | No | 30-day money back guarantee |
Price
PriceLooks at the cost-effectiveness and value for money of each platform.Score Components:
- Plan value (40%): What each pricing tier offers.
- Transparency and clarity (30%): Clearness of pricing structures.
- Flexibility of plans (20%): Range of options to suit different budgets.
- Hidden costs (10%): Additional expenses not included in the plan.
8.1
8.0
Google Sites and Elementor have different pricing structures, with Google Sites offering per user pricing and Elementor offering per website pricing.
Google Sites also offers enterprise plans with custom pricing, while Elementor does not have enterprise level support.
|
| |
---|---|---|
$0-$10 |
|
|
$10-$20 |
|
|
$20-$30 |
|
|
$40+ | No offering at this amount. |
|
In some cases companies have different prices based on various components like a
location. As a result in rare cases the prices displayed here can differ from the ones you see on their
websites.
Hosting quality
Hosting
qualityExamines the reliability and performance of the hosting solutions.Score Components:
- Uptime (40%): Consistency and reliability of website availability.
- Speed (30%): Loading times and performance.
- Bandwidth and storage (20%): Sufficiency of resources provided.
- Data centers (10%): Quality and distribution of hosting infrastructure.
8.2
7.8
🏆
Winner: Google Sites
Google Sites offers cloud-based managed hosting with a 99.9% uptime guarantee and operates 21 data centers globally. Elementor, on the other hand, provides managed WordPress hosting with the same uptime guarantee but only has one data center. Google Sites’ extensive data center network and the ability to increase storage by upgrading to Google Workspace give it a slight edge over Elementor.
Do they offer hosting? | Yes, basic storage with 100MB free per site, can be increased by upgrading to Google Workspace | Yes, included in all their plans, Google Cloud powered hosting, with 10-40GB SSD storage, and daily auto backups stored from 14 to 30 days depending on the plan |
Data Centers: | Google operates a total of 21 data centers across the globe: 2 in Asia, 5 in Europe, 13 in US and 1 in South America | 1 data center in Belgium |
Type of hosting: | Cloud based managed hosting | Managed WordPress Hosting |
Uptime: | 99.9% | 99.9% |
Uptime Guarantee: | Yes, 99.9% | Yes, 99.9% |
Website Speed Optimization
Website Speed OptimizationEvaluates optimization of website loading timesScore Components:
- PageSpeed Score (30%): Google’s score indicating performance optimization.
- Loading Time (30%): The average time until a website is fully interactive.
- Mobile Optimization (15%): Optimization effectiveness for mobile devices.
- Resource Optimization (15%): Optimizing images, scripts, and other heavy resources.
- CDN Usage (10%): Use of CDN to enhance speed across geolocations.
3.3
6.7
🏆 Winner: Elementor
Both Google Sites and Elementor prioritize website performance and page speed, but Elementor has a higher website speed optimization score.
Focus | Automated Optimization, CDN, Mobile Optimization, Browser Caching, Code Minification, Use of AMP | Lazy Loading, Code Minification, Caching, CDN |
Performance Tools | Google Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights | Google PageSpeed Insights Integration |
Key Strategies | Automated Optimization, CDN, Mobile Optimization, Browser Caching, Code Minification, Use of AMP | Lazy Loading, Code Minification, Caching, CDN |
Load Times | Google does not disclose statistics about website Page Speed scores, or load times. | Load times and PageSpeed scores vary depending on optimization and website complexity. |
Page Speed Scores Range | Google does not disclose statistics about website Page Speed scores, or load times. | Load times and PageSpeed scores vary depending on optimization and website complexity. |
Core Web Vitals Improvement | Emphasis on LCP, FID, CLS improvements | Elementor does not disclose any information about its Core Web vitals improvements |
Elementor, a popular website builder plugin for WordPress, focuses on website speed optimization through strategies like lazy loading, code minification, caching, and CDN. However, the load times and PageSpeed scores can vary depending on the optimization and complexity of the website. Elementor does not disclose any information about its Core Web vitals improvements.
On the other hand, Google Sites, a structured web page-creation tool included in the Google Workspace package, uses automated optimization, CDN, mobile optimization, browser caching, code minification, and the use of AMP for speed optimization. However, Google does not disclose any statistics about website Page Speed scores or load times. It does emphasize on LCP, FID, CLS improvements for Core Web Vitals.
Get a head start on website creation with AI
Create a custom website tailored to your business needs 10X faster with 10Web AI Website Builder!
Generate Your Website
No credit card required
Plugins and integrations
Plugins and integrationsMeasures the range and effectiveness of additional plugins and integrations.Score Components:
- Variety of options (40%): Range of available add-ons.
- Integration smoothness (30%): Ease of integrating plugins into the site.
- Quality of plugins (20%): Functionality and reliability of the options.
- Custom integration capabilities (10%): Support for custom or third-party integrations.
6.4
7.6
🏆 Winner: Elementor.
Elementor, with a score of 7.6, offers a wide range of both free and premium plugins and extensions, allowing for deep customization and advanced features. Google Sites, scoring 6.4, also provides a variety of plugins and extensions, but Elementor’s flexibility and integration with various WordPress themes and plugins give it an edge.
It’s worth noting that Google Sites offers a wide array of plugins and extensions to enhance website functionality, catering to various needs such as social media integration, e-commerce, chats, forms, video, audio, and more. However, Elementor’s add-ons extend the functionality beyond the base version, offering advanced widgets, modules, and complete theme building capabilities for deep customization. They enable superior integration with WooCommerce, third-party services, and provide advanced marketing tools to enhance conversions and user engagement.
Marketing Features
Design FunctionalitiesRepresents how well each platform allows for creative design and customization of websites.Score Components:
- Template Variety (30%): Range and quality of design templates.
- Customization (30%): Flexibility and options for design alterations.
- User Interface (20%): Ease and intuitiveness of the design process.
- Responsiveness (10%): Adaptability to different devices and screen sizes.
- Innovation (10%): Unique design features and tools.
2.6
7.8
🏆
Overall Winner: Elementor
. Elementor offers a more comprehensive set of marketing features, including advanced SEO tools, email marketing, blogging, social media integration, analytics and reporting, and ads and promotions. Google Sites, while offering basic features in some categories, lacks in email marketing, blogging, and ads and promotions.
SEO Tools | Basic SEO settings | Advanced SEO with integration of various SEO plugins |
Email Marketing | No | Yes, with integration of various email marketing services and plugins |
Blogging | No | Yes |
Social Media Integration | Basic, manual integration of social media links and widgets | Advanced integration of social media buttons and feeds |
Analytics and Reporting | Google Analytics integration | Google Analytics integration and Elementor Insights |
Ads and Promotions | No | Yes, with features for creating ads and promotions |
Customer Support
Customer supportEvaluates the quality and availability of support options.Score Components:
- Response time (40%): Speed of support responses.
- Support quality (30%): Effectiveness and helpfulness of the support.
- Availability (20%): Range of support channels (phone, chat, email).
- Resource richness (10%): Quality of self-help and educational materials.
7.2
7.2
🏆 Winner: Google Sites
. Google Sites and Elementor both offer 24/7 customer support, but Google Sites takes the lead with its comprehensive support options for Google Workspace customers. Google Sites provides a variety of support channels, including a Help Center, community forums, phone, email, and live chat. The level of support varies by subscription tier, with Google Workspace providing 24/7 support for critical issues to eligible customers.
Elementor, on the other hand, provides customer support with their Customer Experience agents located around the globe to ensure 24/7 availability. They offer support via ticketing and 24/7 live chat support. However, Elementor does not have customer support for enterprises, which gives Google Sites an edge in this category.
Security
SecurityLooks at the platforms’ security measures and data protection.Score Components:
- Data protection (40%): Safeguards for user and customer data.
- SSL and encryption (30%): Implementation of secure connections.
- Compliance (20%): Adherence to industry security standards.
- Regular updates (10%): Frequency of security updates and patches.
9.3
9.1
🏆
Winner: Google Sites
. Google Sites, part of the Google Workspace, offers robust security measures including data encryption, two-factor authentication, and automatic malware scanning. It also benefits from Google’s regular security updates and compliance with international data protection standards. Google’s infrastructure provides DDoS protection and data redundancy, ensuring a secure environment for website creators and visitors.
Elementor also offers a secure platform, leveraging Google Cloud’s infrastructure for high security and end-to-end encryption. It employs both active and passive security measures, including 24/7 monitoring, regular updates, and specialized security protocols. Elementor’s commitment to security is further emphasized by its ISO 27001 certification and a proactive Bug Bounty program. However, Google Sites’ comprehensive security measures and integration with Google’s secure infrastructure give it a slight edge in this category.
AI Capabilities
AI capabilitiesMeasures the effectiveness of AI-driven features and tools.Score Components:
- Automation efficiency (40%): Impact of AI on streamlining processes.
- Personalization (30%): AI-driven customization for users or customers.
- AI-Assisted design (20%): Role of AI in website design and functionality.
- Data analysis (10%): Use of AI in interpreting user data and analytics.
0
7.4
AI Builder | Elementor’s AI builder generates text, custom codes, and images | |
AI Ecommerce features | AI-driven features for eCommerce websites | |
AI content generation | AI content generation capabilities | |
Additional AI features | Integration with third-party AI powered WordPress plugins |
🏆 Winner: Elementor
. Elementor, with a score of 7.4, has introduced an AI builder that offers a range of features including text, custom codes, and image generation. These tools support a complete suite for building every aspect of an online store, from product pages to checkout, with extensive customization options for a unique shopping experience. Additionally, Elementor AI simplifies content creation and website customization, offering tools for image generation, text writing, and code creation, catering specifically to the needs of eCommerce site builders.
Google Sites, with a score of 0, does not have any AI capabilities.
User Management
User ManagementAssesses the platforms’ capabilities in managing user roles, permissions, and accessibility.Score Components:
- Role Customization (40%): Flexibility in creating and defining user roles and
permissions. - Ease of Management (30%): User interface and tools for managing users.
- Access Control (20%): Effectiveness of access control measures for different user
levels. - Scalability (10%): Ability to manage a growing number of users efficiently.
7.8
8.8
🏆 Winner: Elementor
. Both Google Sites and Elementor allow multiple users to collaborate on a website, but they differ in their approach to user roles and permissions.
- Google Sites allows multiple users to collaborate with different roles, including Owners, who have full control, and Editors, who can modify content but not site settings. There’s no strict limit on the number of users who can edit a site, allowing flexibility in management and development. Viewers can only see the site, with no editing permissions. This structure supports collaborative website building with varied levels of access and control for different users.
- The number of users who can edit or manage a website built with Elementor depends on the roles and permissions set within WordPress, as Elementor operates on WordPress. Administrators have full access to edit any part of the site, including Elementor settings, while Editors can manage posts and pages made with Elementor. Authors and Contributors have limited capabilities, with the former being able to manage their own posts. Elementor Pro offers a Role Manager feature, enabling further customization of what different roles can do within Elementor, but there’s no fixed limit on the number of users—it’s determined by the roles assigned by the site administrator.
Elementor User Roles and Access Levels:
Role | Description | Access Highlights |
---|---|---|
Administrator | Users with full access to all administration features, including Elementor settings. | Can edit all content, Access to Elementor settings, Can install plugins and themes, Can manage users |
Editor | Users who can manage and publish content including pages and posts. | Can edit pages/posts created with Elementor, Cannot access Elementor settings, Can manage categories, tags, and links, Can moderate comments |
Author | Users who can publish and manage their own posts. | Can create posts with Elementor, Cannot edit pages, Limited access to media library, Cannot access Elementor settings |
Contributor | Users who can write and manage their own posts but cannot publish them. | Can create content with Elementor, Cannot publish or edit pages, No access to Elementor settings, Submissions require review by higher-level roles |
Additional Features
SSL Certificate | ||
Custom Domain | ||
Free Custom Domain Included | ||
International Domains | ||
Mobile Responsive | ||
Page Speed | ||
Website Builder Mobile App | ||
Convert a Website To An App | ||
Website Analytics | ||
Multilingual Sites | ||
Multiple Users |
User Feedback
Google Sites
42,340 reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
Elementor
345 reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
Google Sites is consistently praised by users, particularly for its seamless integration, ease of use, and collaborative features. It is a popular choice for various professional and educational needs. The platform’s simplicity and user-friendly interface are highly appreciated, enabling effortless website creation and sharing of information within organizations. While some users desire more customization options and additional features, overall, Google Workspace remains highly valued for its versatility and streamlined workflow facilitation.
Elementor, on the other hand, is widely appreciated for its intuitive drag-and-drop interface, enabling rapid creation of professional and responsive websites without coding skills. It offers a vast range of templates and compatibility with WordPress, making it a go-to for diverse users. Despite its benefits, concerns arise regarding website loading times, subscription costs, and occasional compatibility issues. Feedback on customer support and legacy plan management is mixed, with some users experiencing dissatisfaction. Overall, Elementor is valued for its efficiency in web development, although some aspects, particularly support services, could be improved.
The making of this blog
We followed a clear, step-by-step process to write and research this article.
FAQ
Which platform is better for beginners, Google Sites or Elementor?
Elementor is generally better for beginners who are already familiar with WordPress and seek extensive customization options without needing to code. Google Sites offers an even simpler, more intuitive interface ideal for users looking for a straightforward, collaborative platform to create basic websites.
Can I use both Google Sites and Elementor for ecommerce?
Elementor is the clear winner for ecommerce, offering comprehensive integration with WooCommerce, customizable product pages, and a variety of ecommerce-specific widgets. Google Sites lacks native ecommerce functionality and relies on third-party integrations for any ecommerce capabilities.
How do Google Sites and Elementor differ in terms of customization and design flexibility?
Elementor offers greater customization and design flexibility, with a vast library of widgets and templates that enable detailed customization of every webpage element. Google Sites provides a more limited selection of templates and design options, focusing on simplicity and functionality.
What are the major differences in pricing between Google Sites and Elementor?
Google Sites offers a more straightforward pricing structure, primarily through the Google Workspace packages, making it a cost-effective option for basic site needs. Elementor provides a range of pricing tiers based on the number of sites and access to advanced features, catering to a broader range of professional needs with a focus on WordPress sites.
Which platform offers better support for SEO and marketing?
Elementor stands out for its advanced SEO tools, email marketing integrations, and comprehensive marketing features, making it suitable for users aiming to enhance their online presence. Google Sites offers basic SEO settings and integrates well with Google Analytics but lacks advanced marketing tools.
Can I manage a team with either Google Sites or Elementor?
Both platforms allow multiple users to collaborate on website development, but Elementor offers more nuanced user roles and permissions through WordPress, making it better suited for managing larger teams with specific access needs. Google Sites provides a simpler collaboration model, ideal for small teams and straightforward projects.