Robust Nuclear Spin Polarization via Ground-State Level Anti-Crossing of Boron Vacancy Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride (2024)

Shihao RuS. R., Z. J., H. L. and J. K. contributed equally to this work.Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore  Zhengzhi JiangS. R., Z. J., H. L. and J. K. contributed equally to this work.Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, SingaporeJoint School of National University of Singapore and Tianjin University, International Campus of Tianjin University, Binhai New City, Fuzhou 350207, P. R. China  Haidong LiangS. R., Z. J., H. L. and J. K. contributed equally to this work.Centre for Ion Beam Applications, Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117542, Singapore  Jonathan KennyS. R., Z. J., H. L. and J. K. contributed equally to this work.Division of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore  Hongbing CaiDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, SingaporeThe Photonics Institute and Centre for Disruptive Photonic Technologies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore  Xiaodan LyuDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, SingaporeThe Photonics Institute and Centre for Disruptive Photonic Technologies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore  Robert CernanskyInstitute for Quantum Optics and Centre for Integrated Quantum Science and technology (IQST), Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany  Feifei ZhouDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore  Yuzhe YangDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore  Kenji WatanabeInternational Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan  Takashi TaniguchInternational Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan  Fuli LiSchool of Physics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China  Teck Seng KohDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore  Xiaogang LiuDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, SingaporeJoint School of National University of Singapore and Tianjin University, International Campus of Tianjin University, Binhai New City, Fuzhou 350207, P. R. China  Fedor Jelezkofedor.jelezko@uni-ulm.deInstitute for Quantum Optics and Centre for Integrated Quantum Science and technology (IQST), Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany  Andrew A. Bettiola.bettiol@nus.edu.sgCentre for Ion Beam Applications, Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117542, Singapore  Weibo Gaowbgao@ntu.edu.sgDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, SingaporeThe Photonics Institute and Centre for Disruptive Photonic Technologies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, SingaporeCentre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore

(June 1, 2024)

Abstract

Nuclear spin polarization plays a crucial role in quantum information processing and quantum sensing. In this work, we demonstrate a robust and efficient method for nuclear spin polarization with boron vacancy (VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) defects in hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) using ground-state level anti-crossing (GSLAC). We show that GSLAC-assisted nuclear polarization can be achieved with significantly lower laser power than excited-state level anti-crossing, making the process experimentally more viable. Furthermore, we have demonstrated direct optical readout of nuclear spins for VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in h-BN. Our findings suggest that GSLAC is a promising technique for the precise control and manipulation of nuclear spins in VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defects in h-BN.

Optically addressable solid-state spin defects in wide band-gap materials serve as promising artificial atoms for quantum information sciences. For instance, spin defects in diamond and silicon carbide exhibit long spin coherence times, high-fidelity spin manipulations, and entangled electron-nuclear spin pairs at room temperature Bar-Gilletal. (2013); Christleetal. (2015); Toganetal. (2010); Christleetal. (2017); Fuchsetal. (2011); Bourassaetal. (2020). In addition, layered van der Waals materials offer alternative platforms for solid-state spin defects, with reduced dimensionality facilitating scalable two-dimensional quantum device design. Among them, hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) has attracted significant interest due to its exceptional properties, such as wide bandgap, high thermal conductivity, and robust mechanical strength Liuetal. (2022a). Recently, negatively charged boron vacancy (VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) defects in h-BN have been extensively studied for their coherently manipulatable spin states and high optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) contrast at room temperature Gottscholletal. (2021a); Gaoetal. (2021), critical for sensitivity in quantum sensing applications Gottscholletal. (2021b); Lyuetal. (2022); Liuetal. (2021); Huangetal. (2022); Healeyetal. (2022); Allertetal. (2022). Polarization and rapid manipulation of adjacent nitrogen nuclear spins in h-BN via excited-state level anticrossing (ESLAC) have been achieved Gaoetal. (2022), offering avenues to store and manipulate quantum information Caietal. (2013); Tabeshetal. (2023).

Robust Nuclear Spin Polarization via Ground-State Level Anti-Crossing of Boron Vacancy Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride (1)

The ESLAC approach to nuclear spin polarization in h-BN has limitations, such as the need for high excitation laser power and low level of nuclear spin polarization Jacquesetal. (2009); Gottscholletal. (2020); Yuetal. (2022); Muetal. (2022). To address the challenge, we investigate the use of ground-state level anti-crossing (GSLAC) of VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for achieving nuclear spin polarization in h-BN. GSLAC provides several advantages over ESLAC, including increased robustness against excitation laser power fluctuations and higher nuclear spin polarization level. In this paper, we present an in-depth study of the GSLAC method and demonstrate its potential for enhancing the performance of nuclear spin polarization in VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT systems Gaoetal. (2022); Jacquesetal. (2009); Sangtawesinetal. (2016). We initiate our study by evaluating the levels of nuclear polarization at ESLAC and GSLAC regions. Our findings suggest that, even under comparatively low excitation power, GSLAC can induce high levels of nuclear polarization. Then we measure the nuclear polarization level as a function of magnetic field, aiming to find the optimal nuclear polarization level. Lastly, we have demonstrated the direct optical readout of nuclear spins through optically detected nuclear magnetic resonance (ODNMR). These comprehensive experimental endeavors pave the way for advancing quantum information processing, enhancing nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy sensitivity, and enabling the development of high-performance nuclear spin-based sensors.

Boron vacancy and its energy levels. The VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defect in h-BN is a point defect that occurs when a boron atom is missing from the crystal lattice, as shown in Fig. 1(a) Gottscholletal. (2021a). A VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defect has a triplet ground state, a triplet excited state, and a non-radiative singlet metastable state. When illuminated with a green laser, VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defects are optically excited from the ground state to the excited state. The defects can then undergo spin-dependent intersystem crossing (ISC) to the singlet metastable state, leading to spin polarization. The spin-dependent nature of the ISC processes also results in spin-dependent fluorescence, enabling optical detection and manipulation of the VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defect’s spin state. The dynamics is shown in Fig. 1(b) Degenetal. (2017).

Nuclear polarization assisted by GSLAC. As the external magnetic field is tuned, the energy levels of ms=0subscript𝑚𝑠0m_{s}=0italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ms=1subscript𝑚𝑠1m_{s}=-1italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 states become nearly degenerate at certain magnetic field values, leading to LAC Gottscholletal. (2021a); Gaoetal. (2022); Jacquesetal. (2009); Scheueretal. (2016). At these points, the wavefunctions of the electronic and nuclear spin states mix, allowing for a strong interaction between them. Through this interaction, the electronic and nuclear spins can exchange spin angular momentum. This can be facilitated by a process called flip-flop, where the electronic spin flips while the nuclear spin flops simultaneously in the opposite direction. A diagram of dynamics of nuclear polarization assisted by GSLAC is shown in Fig. 1(c). The flip-flop process is indicated by grey arrows. As a result, the spin polarization of the electronic spin is transferred to the nuclear spins, enhancing their polarization.

Sample preparation and setup.h-BN flakes with thickness of several μ𝜇\mathrm{\mu}italic_μm were proton-bombarded at 250 keV energy and 3e16 cm2superscriptcm2\mathrm{cm}^{-2}roman_cm start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT dose to create dense VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defects Liangetal. (2023).A homemade confocal microscope were used in the experiment. A 40x/0.6 visible objective focused the excitation laser onto the sample and collected fluorescence. A 532 nm laser modulated by an Acoustic Optical Modulator provided off-resonance excitation. The photoluminescence signal, filtered through a 700-nm long pass and 1000-nm short pass filter, was coupled to a photodiode. The microwave generated by an RF signal generator and gated by an RF switch, was amplified, and applied to the sample via a coplanar waveguide where the h-BN flake was placed. A permanent magnet on a 3-axis motorized translation stage provided the magnetic field. Magnetic field alignment along the sample’s c-axis was done before the experiment Supp_info .

Extraction of populations of nuclear spin states. For VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defects, the hyperfine interactions between the central electron spin and the three nearest nitrogen nuclear spins cause each electronic state to split into 7 sublevels.This results in an ODMR peak that consists of 7 subpeaks, separated by a hyperfine value of approximately 47 MHz Gottscholletal. (2021a); Gaoetal. (2022).To analyze the population of the nuclear spin states, the ODMR results are fitted with 7 peaks corresponding to these sublevels. By fitting the ODMR results with 7 subpeaks, we can extract the area of each subpeak, which is proportional to the population of the corresponding nuclear spin state Gaoetal. (2022); Jacquesetal. (2009). This allows us to determine the nuclear spin polarization in the VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT system and further analyze the effectiveness of the GSLAC and ESLAC techniques for achieving nuclear spin polarization.

Robust Nuclear Spin Polarization via Ground-State Level Anti-Crossing of Boron Vacancy Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride (2)

Laser Power Dependence in ESLAC and GSLAC: A Comparative Study. The laser power requirements for the ESLAC and GSLAC methods in achieving nuclear spin polarization can be studied with pulsed ODMR spectra. Pulsed ODMR measurements are conducted at magnetic fields indicated by the shaded areas in Fig. 2(a). The lower and upper shaded fields correspond to the regions near ESLAC and GSLAC, respectively. The implemented measurement sequence is outlined in Fig. 2(b). We define the contrast of pulsed ODMR as (S1S2)/(S1+S2)subscript𝑆1subscript𝑆2subscript𝑆1subscript𝑆2(S_{1}-S_{2})/(S_{1}+S_{2})( italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / ( italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ).

Pulsed ODMR results near the ESLAC region (74.9 mT) are analyzed with two laser powers: 150 mW (Fig. 2(c)) and 1.5 mW (Fig. 2(d)). We employ the formula,

Pnuclear=(mIAI)/(3AI),subscript𝑃nuclearsubscript𝑚𝐼subscript𝐴𝐼3subscript𝐴𝐼P_{\mathrm{nuclear}}=(\sum m_{I}A_{I})/(3\sum A_{I}),italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_nuclear end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( ∑ italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) / ( 3 ∑ italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ,(1)

to quantitatively compute the nuclear polarization levels, where mIsubscript𝑚𝐼m_{I}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the quantum number of nuclear spin state and AIsubscript𝐴𝐼A_{I}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the area of subpeak of mIsubscript𝑚𝐼m_{I}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT nuclear spin state.We observe nuclear polarization levels of 0.0655±0.008plus-or-minus0.06550.0080.0655\pm 0.0080.0655 ± 0.008 and 0.0343±0.024plus-or-minus0.03430.0240.0343\pm 0.0240.0343 ± 0.024 for 150 mW and 1.5 mW, respectively.The relatively lower polarization at 1.5 mW suggests that ESLAC demands high laser power for increasing nuclear spin polarization, even though still in a modest level. In contrast, pulsed ODMR results near the GSLAC region (154.6 mT) are depicted in Fig. 2(e) and (f) for laser powers of 150 mW and 1.5 mW, respectively. Both measurements exhibit high nuclear polarization, with levels of 0.225±0.006plus-or-minus0.2250.0060.225\pm 0.0060.225 ± 0.006 and 0.170±0.023plus-or-minus0.1700.0230.170\pm 0.0230.170 ± 0.023 for 150 mW and 1.5 mW, respectively. These results underscore the efficiency of GSLAC in achieving substantial nuclear spin polarization in h-BN systems, even at lower excitation laser power, compared to ESLAC. This characteristic renders GSLAC more advantageous for practical applications where low-power operation is desired.

The robustness of GSLAC-assisted nuclear polarization is attributed to the longer residence time in the ground state prior to excitation due to light absorption.The nuclear polarization process entails two steps: initial electron spin polarization through spin-dependent ISC under laser illumination, followed by transfer of this polarization to the nuclear spins.The transfer occurs due to the precession of superposition states, either at the excited states (ESLAC) or the ground states (GSLAC) Jacquesetal. (2009). A shorter residence time, such as the excited state lifetime of about 1.258 ns at room temperature (refer to Supp_info ), restricts the duration for the flip-flop process to occur. This results in the system rapidly reverting to the ground state, thus curtailing the DNP level achievable at low pump power.

Robust Nuclear Spin Polarization via Ground-State Level Anti-Crossing of Boron Vacancy Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride (3)

Optimization of nuclear polarization. To identify the magnetic field range that yields the highest nuclear polarization level, we assessed the nuclear polarization levels over a magnetic field range spanning from 25 mT to 200 mT. This span encapsulates both the ESLAC and GSLAC regions. It’s important to note that the data corresponding to the precise GSLAC point, occurring around 133 mT in Fig. 3, could not be obtained from ODMR spectra due to significant spin state mixing. To accelerate the measurements and obtain reliable estimates for nuclear polarization levels, we opted for continuous wave (CW) ODMR, which provides superior signal-to-noise ratio. It should be stressed that, within the ESLAC region, CW ODMR enables greater nuclear polarization levels compared to pulsed ODMR, because of the higher average laser power.

The collected data, pertaining to a laser power of 112 mW, are depicted as green dots in Fig. 3. Upon the gradual increment of the magnetic field to 74.9 mT (ESLAC), we observed a peak in the nuclear polarization level. Subsequently, as the magnetic field continued to increase, the polarization level initially decreased, only to start rising again upon entering the GSLAC region. The polarization level exhibits a gradual decline beyond the GSLAC point and this trend persists with further elevation in the magnetic field. The highest nuclear polarization level observed experimentally, 0.262±0.005plus-or-minus0.2620.0050.262\pm 0.0050.262 ± 0.005, manifests around 141 mT. This magnetic field is the closest measurable point to the GSLAC in our experimental field range.

To estimate the nuclear polarization within the region near the GSLAC (100 to 140 mT), where experimental data could not be obtained, we performed a theoretical simulation. We model the system with a Hamiltonian, consisting of an electronic spin (VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT) and three adjacent nitrogen nuclear spins Supp_info ; Gaoetal. (2022). The population of each state is extracted after arbitrarily long laser interaction to ensure that a steady state is reached.To get the levels of nuclear polarization at the strong mixing range, we extract the population of each mIsubscript𝑚𝐼m_{I}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I end_POSTSUBSCRIPT state from the simulation results. The nuclear polarization levels calculated as a function of magnetic field are depicted as a green curve in Fig. 3. In our simulation, the nuclear polarization peaks at a level of 0.311, occurring near a magnetic field strength of 127 mT. The nuclear polarization levels predicted by our simulation align well with our experimental results within the measurable ranges, underscoring the reliability of our model Heetal. (1993).

It is important to note that the observed relatively low nuclear polarization level can be attributed to the unequal hyperfine interaction components, Axxsubscript𝐴𝑥𝑥A_{xx}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Ayysubscript𝐴𝑦𝑦A_{yy}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. These elements contribute to the non-diagonal hyperfine Hamiltonian, which promotes not only zero-quantum transitions but also two-quantum transitions in the vicinity of the LAC WokaunandErnst (1977); HughesandGeiger (1955). Unlike in NV centers, this leads to unprotected highest quantum states in boron vacancies, |ms=0,mItotal=+3ketformulae-sequencesubscript𝑚𝑠0subscript𝑚𝐼𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙3\ket{m_{s}=0,m_{Itotal}=+3}| start_ARG italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I italic_t italic_o italic_t italic_a italic_l end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = + 3 end_ARG ⟩, affecting nuclear polarization. Our simulations, depicted in FIG. S11, support this, showing higher polarization with equal hyperfine components. Future research could beneficially focus on strain engineering as a method to adjust the Axxsubscript𝐴𝑥𝑥A_{xx}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and Ayysubscript𝐴𝑦𝑦A_{yy}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT hyperfine components, potentially leading to greater polarization levels Supp_info .

Robust Nuclear Spin Polarization via Ground-State Level Anti-Crossing of Boron Vacancy Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride (4)

Optically detected nuclear magnetic resonance.The nuclear polarization induced by flip-flop can lead to the direct optical readout of nuclear spins. When only zero-quantum transitions are considered,|ms=0,mI1,I2,I3=+1,+1,+1ketformulae-sequencesubscript𝑚𝑠0subscript𝑚subscript𝐼1subscript𝐼2subscript𝐼3111\left|m_{s}=0,m_{I_{1},I_{2},I_{3}}=+1,+1,+1\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = + 1 , + 1 , + 1 ⟩ gives the largest fluorescence signal in general because it didn’t go through the flip-flop transition.(any flip of nuclear spins will lead to |ms=+1ketsubscript𝑚𝑠1\left|m_{s}=+1\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = + 1 ⟩,which has different energy level with |ms=0ketsubscript𝑚𝑠0\left|m_{s}=0\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ⟩, and therefor no mixing is happening).Other states, for instance, |ms=0,mI1,I2,I3=0,+1,+1ketformulae-sequencesubscript𝑚𝑠0subscript𝑚subscript𝐼1subscript𝐼2subscript𝐼3011\left|m_{s}=0,m_{I_{1},I_{2},I_{3}}=0,+1,+1\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 , + 1 , + 1 ⟩ can mix with |ms=1,mI1,I2,I3=+1,+1,+1ketformulae-sequencesubscript𝑚𝑠1subscript𝑚subscript𝐼1subscript𝐼2subscript𝐼3111\left|m_{s}=-1,m_{I_{1},I_{2},I_{3}}=+1,+1,+1\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 , italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_I start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 3 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = + 1 , + 1 , + 1 ⟩, which subsequently transits to a dark state via ISC.Therefore, this reduces the fluorescence from such states since it goes through the dark state. This mechanism will allow us to read the nuclear state directly with sequence as shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b), an approach as ODNMR. The role of two-quantum transitions on ODNMR is discussed in the Ref. Supp_info .

Fig. 4(c) shows an example of ODNMR spectrum for the transitions within spin sublevels for |ms=0ketsubscript𝑚𝑠0\left|m_{s}=0\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ⟩ at magnetic field of 80 mT.The RF applied will address the transition between two states and therefore reduce the fluorescence if there is a discrepancy in the brightness of the two states, as shown in inset.This leads to a negative value in the ODNMR contrast, which is calculated as (Signal -- Reference) / (Signal + Reference).Top panel in Fig. 4(c) denotes the transitions as simulated. The simulation result agrees well with the experimental ODNMR spectrum shown in the bottom panel.Similarly, if we apply additional two microwave π𝜋\piitalic_π pulses, this will allow us to measure the transitions between nuclear spin sublevels for |ms=1ketsubscript𝑚𝑠1\left|m_{s}=-1\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 ⟩. Fig. 4(d) shows an example for the transitions for spin sublevels of |ms=1ketsubscript𝑚𝑠1\left|m_{s}=-1\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 ⟩. The ODNMR signals below 30 MHz in Fig. 4(d) are attributable to the imperfection of the MW π𝜋\piitalic_π pulse, which leaves a residual population in the |ms=0ketsubscript𝑚𝑠0\left|m_{s}=0\right>| italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 ⟩ state.

The full scan of ODNMR spectrum as a function of magnetic field is shown in Fig. 4(e) and Fig. 4(f). From Fig. 4(e), in the range of 100 to 140 mT, one can see that a larger ODNMR contrast can be achieved when we are approaching the GSLAC point at 128 mT and the linewidth of ODNMR transitions gets broader due to stronger mixing. At exactly 128 mT, we observe a sudden drop in the contrast of the ODNMR spectra.This decrease can be attributed to extensive state mixing between ms=0subscript𝑚𝑠0m_{s}=0italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0 and ms=1subscript𝑚𝑠1m_{s}=-1italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1, resulting in reduced electron spin polarization Heetal. (1993). This is corroborated by our simulation results showcased in FIG. S12. Fig. 4(d) showcases the ODNMR results for the ms=1subscript𝑚𝑠1m_{s}=-1italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 branch. Similar conclusions to those previously discussed can be drawn from this data: as the magnetic field enters the range of 100 to 113 mT, and 134 mT to 140 mT, the transitions noticeably broaden, signifying a high degree of state mixing.

Conclusion. In summary, we have demonstrated a robust approach for polarizing nuclear spins in h-BN, leveraging the Ground-State Level Anticrossing of VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. Notably, this method can be executed under low-power excitation. The durability of the GSLAC-assisted nuclear polarization is attributable to the extended residence time of ground states in comparison to excited states. Our simulations suggest that an optimized level of nuclear polarization can be attained near a magnetic field strength of 133 mT, where strong state mixing occurs.We emphasize that this GSLAC-assisted nuclear polarization method is broadly applicable and not confined to the specific color center examined in this study.Combined with dynamic decoupling methods to extend the coherence time Rizzatoetal. (2023) and the measured coherent rotation of coupled nitrogen nuclear spins results at GSLAC Supp_info , the reliable polarization of nuclear spins in van der Waals materials has promising implications for quantum sensing technologies and quantum information science, including potential applications in hyperpolarization of samples Glennetal. (2018) and quantum registers Duttetal. (2007).

Acknowledgements.

S. R., J. K., H. B., X. D., F. Z., Y. Z. and W. G. acknowledge Singapore National Research foundation through QEP Grants (NRF2021-QEP2-01-P01, NRF2021-QEP2-01-P02, NRF2021-QEP2-03-P01, NRF2021-QEP2-03-P10, NRF2021-QEP2-03-P11), ASTAR IRG (M21K2c0116) and Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE2016-T3-1-006 (S)), the Australian Research council (via CE200100010), and the Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development Grant FA2386-17-1-4064, Office of Naval Research Global (N62909-22-1-2028).F. J. acknowledges the support of Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF, ERC (Synergy Grant HyperQ), European Commission (Projects FLORIN, QCIRCLE QuMICRO), DFG (Excellence Cluster POLiS, CRC 1279, and projects 499424854, 387073854) and Carl Zeiss Stiftung.H. L. and A. A. B. acknowledge Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE-T2EP50221-0009).

References

  • Bar-Gilletal. (2013)NirBar-Gill, LinhMPham,AndrejsJarmola, DmitryBudker, andRonaldLWalsworth,“Solid-state electronic spin coherencetime approaching one second,”Nature communications4,1–6 (2013).
  • Christleetal. (2015)DavidJChristle, AbramLFalk, PaoloAndrich,PaulVKlimov, JawadUlHassan, NguyenTSon, ErikJanzén, TakeshiOhshima, andDavidDAwschalom,“Isolated electron spins in silicon carbide withmillisecond coherence times,”Nature materials14,160–163 (2015).
  • Toganetal. (2010)EmreTogan, YiwenChu,AlexeiSTrifonov,LiangJiang, JeronimoMaze, LilianChildress, MVGurudevDutt, AndersSøndbergSørensen, PhillipRHemmer, AlexanderSZibrov, andM.D.Lukin,“Quantum entanglement between an opticalphoton and a solid-state spin qubit,”Nature466,730–734 (2010).
  • Christleetal. (2017)DavidJ.Christle, PaulV.Klimov, CharlesF.delas Casas, KrisztiánSzász, ViktorIvády, ValdasJokubavicius, JawadUlHassan, MikaelSyväjärvi, WilliamF.Koehl, TakeshiOhshima, NguyenT.Son, ErikJanzén, ÁdámGali, andDavidD.Awschalom,“Isolated spinqubits in SiC with a high-fidelity infrared spin-to-photon interface,”Phys. Rev. X7,021046 (2017).
  • Fuchsetal. (2011)GDFuchs, GuidoBurkard,PVKlimov, andDDAwschalom,“A quantum memory intrinsic to singlenitrogen–vacancy centres in diamond,”Nature Physics7,789–793 (2011).
  • Bourassaetal. (2020)AlexandreBourassa, ChristopherPAnderson, KevinCMiao, MykytaOnizhuk, HeMa,AlexanderLCrook,HiroshiAbe, JawadUl-Hassan, TakeshiOhshima, NguyenTSon, GiuliaGalli, andDavidD.Awschalom,“Entanglement and control of single nuclear spinsin isotopically engineered silicon carbide,”Nature Materials19,1319–1325 (2020).
  • Liuetal. (2022a)WeiLiu, Nai-JieGuo,ShangYu, YuMeng, Zhi-PengLi, Yuan-ZeYang, Zhao-AnWang, Xiao-DongZeng, Lin-KeXie, QiangLi, Jun-FengWang, Jin-ShiXu, Yi-TaoWang, Jian-ShunTang,Chuan-FengLi, andGuang-CanGuo,“Spin-active defects inhexagonal boron nitride,”Materials for QuantumTechnology2,032002(2022a).
  • Gottscholletal. (2021a)AndreasGottscholl, MatthiasDiez, VictorSoltamov,ChristianKasper,AndreasSperlich,MehranKianinia, CarloBradac, IgorAharonovich, andVladimirDyakonov,“Room temperature coherent control of spindefects in hexagonal boron nitride,”ScienceAdvances7,eabf3630(2021a).
  • Gaoetal. (2021)XingyuGao, BoyangJiang,AndresE.LlacsahuangaAllcca, KunhongShen, MohammadA.Sadi, AbhishekB.Solanki, PengJu, ZhujingXu, PrameyUpadhyaya,YongP.Chen, SunilA.Bhave, andTongcangLi,“High-contrast plasmonic-enhanced shallow spindefects in hexagonal boron nitride for quantum sensing,”Nano Letters21,7708–7714 (2021).
  • Gottscholletal. (2021b)AndreasGottscholl, MatthiasDiez, VictorSoltamov,ChristianKasper,DominikKrauße,AndreasSperlich,MehranKianinia, CarloBradac, IgorAharonovich, andVladimirDyakonov,“Spin defects in hBN as promising temperature,pressure and magnetic field quantum sensors,”Nature communications12,4480 (2021b).
  • Lyuetal. (2022)XiaodanLyu, QinghaiTan,LishuWu, ChushengZhang, ZhaoweiZhang, ZhaoMu, JesúsZúñiga-Pérez, HongbingCai, andWeiboGao,“Strain quantum sensing with spin defects in hexagonal boronnitride,”Nano Letters22,6553–6559 (2022).
  • Liuetal. (2021)WeiLiu, Zhi-PengLi,Yuan-ZeYang, ShangYu, YuMeng, Zhao-AnWang, Ze-ChengLi, Nai-JieGuo, Fei-FeiYan,QiangLi, Jun-FengWang, Jin-ShiXu, Yi-TaoWang, Jian-ShunTang, Chuan-FengLi, andGuang-CanGuo,“Temperature-dependent energy-level shifts ofspin defects in hexagonal boron nitride,”ACSPhotonics8,1889–1895(2021).
  • Huangetal. (2022)MengqiHuang, JingchengZhou,DiChen, HanyiLu, NathanJMcLaughlin, SenleiLi, MohammedAlghamdi, DzigaDjugba, JingShi, HailongWang, andChunhuiRitaDu,“Wide field imaging of vander Waals ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2 by spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride,”Nature communications13,5369 (2022).
  • Healeyetal. (2022)A.J.Healey, S.C.Scholten, T.Yang,J.A.Scott, G.J.Abrahams, I.O.Robertson, X.F.Hou, Y.F.Guo, S.Rahman, Y.Lu, M.Kianinia, I.Aharonovich, andJ.-P.Tetienne,“Quantummicroscopy with van der Waals heterostructures,”NaturePhysics,1–5 (2022).
  • Allertetal. (2022)RobinDerekAllert, FlemingBruckmaier, NickRubenNeuling, FabianAlexanderFreire-Moschovitis, KristinaSongLiu, ClaudiaSchrepel, PhilipSchätzle, PeterKnittel, MartinHermans, andDominikBenjaminBucher,“Microfluidic quantum sensing platform for lab-on-a-chipapplications,”Lab on a Chip22,4831–4840 (2022).
  • Gaoetal. (2022)XingyuGao, SumukhVaidya,KejunLi, PengJu, BoyangJiang, ZhujingXu, Andres ELlacsahuangaAllcca, KunhongShen, Takash*taniguchi, KenjiWatanabe, SunilA.Bhave, YongP.Chen, YuanPing, andTongcangLi,“Nuclear spin polarization and control in hexagonal boronnitride,”Nature Materials21,1024–1028 (2022).
  • Caietal. (2013)JianmingCai, AlexRetzker, FedorJelezko, andMartinBPlenio,“A large-scalequantum simulator on a diamond surface at room temperature,”Nature Physics9,168–173 (2013).
  • Tabeshetal. (2023)F.T.Tabesh, M.Fani,J.S.Pedernales,M.B.Plenio, andM.Abdi,“Active hyperpolarization of the nuclearspin lattice: Application to hexagonal boron nitride color centers,”Phys. Rev. B107,214307 (2023).
  • Jacquesetal. (2009)V.Jacques, P.Neumann,J.Beck, M.Markham, D.Twitchen, J.Meijer, F.Kaiser, G.Balasubramanian, F.Jelezko, andJ.Wrachtrup,“Dynamic polarization of single nuclear spins by optical pumping ofnitrogen-vacancy color centers in diamond at room temperature,”Phys. Rev. Lett.102,057403 (2009).
  • Gottscholletal. (2020)AndreasGottscholl, MehranKianinia, VictorSoltamov, SergeiOrlinskii, GeorgyMamin, CarloBradac,ChristianKasper,KlausKrambrock, AndreasSperlich, MilosToth, IgorAharonovich, andVladimirDyakonov,“Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spindefects in a van der Waals crystal at room temperature,”NatureMaterials19,540–545(2020).
  • Yuetal. (2022)PeiYu, HaoyuSun,MengqiWang, TaoZhang, XiangyuYe, JingweiZhou, HangyuLiu, Cheng-JieWang, FazhanShi, YaWang, andJiangfengDu,“Excited-state spectroscopy of spin defects inhexagonal boron nitride,”Nano Letters22,3545–3549 (2022).
  • Muetal. (2022)ZhaoMu, HongbingCai,DishengChen, JonathanKenny, ZhengzhiJiang, ShihaoRu, XiaodanLyu, TeckSengKoh, XiaogangLiu, IgorAharonovich, andWeiboGao,“Excited-stateoptically detected magnetic resonance of spin defects in hexagonal boronnitride,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128,216402 (2022).
  • Sangtawesinetal. (2016)SSangtawesin, CAMcLellan, BAMyers,ACBleszynskiJayich,DDAwschalom, andJRPetta,“Hyperfine-enhanced gyromagnetic ratio ofa nuclear spin in diamond,”New Journal of Physics18,083016 (2016).
  • Degenetal. (2017)C.L.Degen, F.Reinhard, andP.Cappellaro,“Quantum sensing,”Rev. Mod. Phys.89,035002 (2017).
  • Scheueretal. (2016)JochenScheuer, IlaiSchwartz, QiongChen,DavidSchulze-Sünninghausen, PatrickCarl, PeterHöfer, AlexanderRetzker, HitoshiSumiya, JunichiIsoya,andBurkhardLuy,“Optically induced dynamicnuclear spin polarisation in diamond,”New journal of Physics18,013040 (2016).
  • Liangetal. (2023)HaidongLiang, YuanChen,ChengyuanYang, KenjiWatanabe, Takash*taniguchi, GokiEda, andAndrewABettiol,“High sensitivity spin defects in hBN created byhigh-energy He beam irradiation,”Advanced Optical Materials11,2201941 (2023).
  • (27) See Supplemental Material at https://——/—–, which includes Refs. [9, 16, 22, 34-44],for additional information about the experimental methods and a detailed discussion of experimental and simulation results.
  • Heetal. (1993)Xing-FeiHe, NeilB.Manson, andPeter T.H.Fisk,“Paramagnetic resonance of photoexcited N–V defects in diamond. II. hyperfineinteraction with the N14superscriptN14{}^{14}\mathrm{N}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT roman_N nucleus,”Phys.Rev. B47,8816–8822(1993).
  • WokaunandErnst (1977)AWokaunandRichardRErnst,“Selectivedetection of multiple quantum transitions in NMR by two-dimensionalspectroscopy,”Chemical Physics Letters52,407–412 (1977).
  • HughesandGeiger (1955)V.W.HughesandJ.S.Geiger,“Two-quantumtransitions in the microwave Zeeman spectrum of atomic oxygen,”Phys. Rev.99,1842–1845 (1955).
  • Rizzatoetal. (2023)RobertoRizzato, MartinSchalk, StephanMohr,JensCHermann, JoachimPLeibold, FlemingBruckmaier, GiovannaSalvitti, ChenjiangQian, PeiruiJi, GeorgyVAstakhov, UlrichKentsch, ManfredHelm, AndreasV.Stier, JonathanJ.Finley, andDominikB.Bucher,“Extending the coherence of spin defects in hBNenables advanced qubit control and quantum sensing,”Nature Communications14,5089 (2023).
  • Glennetal. (2018)DavidRGlenn, DominikBBucher, JunghyunLee,MikhailDLukin, HongkunPark, andRonaldLWalsworth,“High-resolution magnetic resonancespectroscopy using a solid-state spin sensor,”Nature555,351–354 (2018).
  • Duttetal. (2007)M.V.GurudevDutt, L.Childress, L.Jiang,E.Togan, J.Maze, F.Jelezko, A.S.Zibrov, P.R.Hemmer, andM.D.Lukin,“Quantum register based on individual electronic and nuclear spin qubits indiamond,”Science316,1312–1316 (2007).
  • Bucheretal. (2019)DominikBBucher, DianaPLAudeCraik, MikaelPBacklund, MatthewJTurner, OrenBenDor, DavidRGlenn, andRonaldLWalsworth,“Quantumdiamond spectrometer for nanoscale NMR and ESR spectroscopy,”Nature Protocols14,2707–2747 (2019).
  • TicozziandViola (2009)FrancescoTicozziandLorenzaViola,“Analysis and synthesis of attractive quantum markovian dynamics,”Automatica45,2002–2009 (2009).
  • Ivádyetal. (2020)ViktorIvády, GergelyBarcza, GergőThiering, SongLi,HanenHamdi, Jyh-PinChou, ÖrsLegeza, andAdamGali,“Ab initio theory of the negatively charged boron vacancyqubit in hexagonal boron nitride,”npj Computational Materials6,1–6 (2020).
  • Baberetal. (2021)SimonBaber, Ralph NicholasEdwardMalein, PrinceKhatri, PaulStevenKeatley, ShiGuo, FreddieWithers,AndrewJRamsay, andIsaacJLuxmoore,“Excited state spectroscopyof boron vacancy defects in hexagonal boron nitride using time-resolvedoptically detected magnetic resonance,”Nano Letters22,461–467 (2021).
  • Reimersetal. (2020)JeffreyRReimers, JunShen, MehranKianinia,CarloBradac, IgorAharonovich, MichaelJFord, andPiotrPiecuch,“Photoluminescence, photophysics, andphotochemistry of the VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT defect in hexagonal boron nitride,”Physical Review B102,144105 (2020).
  • Liuetal. (2022b)WeiLiu, ViktorIvády,Zhi-PengLi, Yuan-ZeYang, ShangYu, YuMeng, Zhao-AnWang, Nai-JieGuo, Fei-FeiYan, QiangLi,Jun-FengWang, Jin-ShiXu, Zong-QuanZhou, YangDong, Xiang-DongChen, Fang-WenSun, Jian-ShunTang, AdamGali, andamd GuoGuang-CanLi, Chuan-Feng,“Coherent dynamics of multi-spin VBsuperscriptsubscriptVB\mathrm{V_{B}^{-}}roman_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTcenter in hexagonal boron nitride,”Nature Communications13,5713 (2022b).
  • Londonetal. (2013)P.London, J.Scheuer,J.-M.Cai, I.Schwarz, A.Retzker, M.B.Plenio, M.Katagiri, T.Teraji, S.Koizumi, J.Isoya, R.Fischer, L.P.McGuinness, B.Naydenov, andF.Jelezko,“Detecting and polarizing nuclear spins with double resonance on asingle electron spin,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111,067601 (2013).
  • Farfurniketal. (2018)D.Farfurnik, Y.Horowicz,andN.Bar-Gill,“Identifying and decouplingmany-body interactions in spin ensembles in diamond,”Phys.Rev. A98,033409(2018).
  • Senkallaetal. (2024)KatharinaSenkalla, GenkoGenov, MathiasH.Metsch, PetrSiyushev, andFedorJelezko, “Germanium vacancy in diamond quantum memory exceeding 20ms,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132,026901 (2024).
  • Jarmolaetal. (2020)A.Jarmola, I.Fescenko,V.M.Acosta, M.W.Doherty, F.K.Fatemi, T.Ivanov, D.Budker, andV.S.Malinovsky,“Robust optical readout and characterization of nuclear spin transitions innitrogen-vacancy ensembles in diamond,”Phys. Rev. Res.2,023094 (2020).
  • Kolkowitzetal. (2012)ShimonKolkowitz, QuirinP.Unterreithmeier, StevenD.Bennett, andMikhailD.Lukin,“Sensing distant nuclear spins with a single electron spin,”Phys. Rev. Lett.109,137601 (2012).
Robust Nuclear Spin Polarization via Ground-State Level Anti-Crossing of Boron Vacancy Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

Last Updated:

Views: 5865

Rating: 4 / 5 (71 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Pres. Lawanda Wiegand

Birthday: 1993-01-10

Address: Suite 391 6963 Ullrich Shore, Bellefort, WI 01350-7893

Phone: +6806610432415

Job: Dynamic Manufacturing Assistant

Hobby: amateur radio, Taekwondo, Wood carving, Parkour, Skateboarding, Running, Rafting

Introduction: My name is Pres. Lawanda Wiegand, I am a inquisitive, helpful, glamorous, cheerful, open, clever, innocent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.